<HTML><FONT FACE=arial,helvetica><HTML><FONT COLOR="#000000" FACE="American Typewriter" LANG="0" SIZE="3"><BR>
</FONT><FONT COLOR="#000000" FACE="American Typewriter" LANG="0" SIZE="3">I agree with Keith and John Harris.<BR>
<BR>
I don't know what antiwar movement Gary's referring to, but for 3-4 years I marched and worked in a mass antiwar movement against the Vietnam War with the call for OUT NOW!! I still have my pins!!!<BR>
<BR>
For us (O29 coalition), to take a position so that the antiwar movement can be more palatable to the Democrats, is not only pathetic, it is irresponsible and repugnant. Why would the antiwar movement concede to a time table that would result in the deaths of more Iraqi women and children as well as more US troops?<BR>
<BR>
</FONT><FONT COLOR="#0000FF" FACE="American Typewriter" LANG="0" SIZE="3">LeBlanc writes: </FONT><FONT COLOR="#0000FF" FACE="American Typewriter" LANG="0" SIZE="3"><I>"It is up to us to turn the growing opposition to Bush into a massive movement to set the date and bring the troops home now."</I></FONT><FONT COLOR="#000000" FACE="American Typewriter" LANG="0" SIZE="3"><BR>
<BR>
There's only one date that allows for us to bring the troops home now: NOW, not later at a date to be determined by Congress.<BR>
<BR>
To concede anything less than OUT NOW, sounds like "a little bit more of this war is okay." How many more months are okay? How many more deaths tolerable? How much more fiscal havoc on our schools, elderly, veterans and poor is reasonable collateral damage? <BR>
<BR>
Arlene TM</FONT><FONT COLOR="#000000" FACE="American Typewriter" LANG="0" SIZE="3"><BR>
</FONT><FONT COLOR="#000000" FACE="American Typewriter" LANG="0" SIZE="3"></FONT></HTML>