[O29] Arabs and Muslims, "Middle America, " and building our movement
Gus
gustavo at espada.biz
Wed Oct 5 13:20:45 PDT 2005
Isn't the point here that this is an example of racist scapegoating, and
so that SHOULD be one of the demands? Should we avoid such language in
the hope that those cops will be drawn to the anti-war movement? I
don't think that the lessons of Vietnam were that you could take someone
who likes to beat up students and turn them into someone who will join
with them--I think most "hard-hats" who came around did so at least in
part in reaction to the violence of some of their peers. We don't have
to deny the racist nature of this war in order to gain the support of
middle america...
On 10/5/2005 4:05 PM, R Miller wrote:
> Keith,
>
> I could not follow your argument at all.
>
> I don't know what is meant by "hard hats" but if you think racism and
> beating on students isn't happening, you are sadly mistaken.
>
> Witness the recent pouncing and pounding on of a peaceful Pakistani
> student US VETERAN at George Mason University.
>
> *Full Report: Student Brutalized by Cops, Right-Wing Students,
> for Protesting Recruiters At George Mason U*
> *M. Junaid Alam*
>
> -* See Pictures of Arrest*-
>
>
> http://lefthook.org/Ground/Alam100505pictures.html
>
> A Pakistani-American who served four years in the United
> States Air Force as munitions personnel was beaten and
> brutalized by right-wing students and campus police last
> Thursday at George Mason University in Fairfax, Virginia.
>
> Tariq Khan, now a junior majoring in sociology, said he was
> standing in front of the recruitment table outside the school
> student center - as he has often done before - during noontime
> with a paper sign reading, "Recruiters lie, don't be
> deceived," taped to his shirt. A student approached Khan and
> initiated a verbal argument, screaming in his face; he then
> took the flyer and ripped it up in front of him, Khan says.
>
> The student then left and returned with another student
> claiming to be a Marine having recently served in Iraq, and
> the three continued a verbal argument that began to escalate,
> Khan claimed. "I asked the marine, 'So how many people did you
> kill?'" Khan said. "And he answered, 'Not enough.'" The marine
> student soon ripped Khan's sign off his shirt and threw it in
> the trash.
>
> Shortly thereafter, two of Khan's friends came to his defense,
> and a college staff member told Khan he had to leave because
> he had no permit to table in the area. "I didn't even have a
> table to begin with, so I didn't see why I needed a permit for
> one," Khan said. "Besides, to have a table, you need to be a
> campus group, and we didn't have one," he added, pointing out
> that the student council denied an anti-war group's right to
> exist on campus earlier because it contained several anarchists.
>
> The staff member called campus security, at which point a
> police officer, Lt. Reynolds, approached Khan and demanded to
> see his student ID. Khan said he told the officer he was not
> carrying his ID and tried to walk away when the policeman
> tried to arrest him and then became violent. "He threw me into
> the stage," Khan claimed, referring to a dance area in the
> student center left from an event earlier in the day, "and I
> just sort of raised my hands to show I'm not violent and tried
> to get as much attention by saying, 'I'm being non-violent and
> I'm being brutalized.'"
>
> Fellow student and friend Amie Wells confirmed Khan's account,
> saying the officer "grabbed him, put him in a half-nelson
> headlock," and then "slammed him into a metal stage," propped
> three feet above the floor. Wells added that the officer then
> slammed Khan into the ground hard, resulting in his face
> hitting the surface.
>
> Describing the atmosphere, Wells said a number of right-wing
> students were cheering on police officers who were attacking
> Khan, exclaiming, "Kick him!" She claimed most of the crowd
> appeared to be on the side of the police. "It was disgusting,"
> she said. Another student who witnessed events, David Curtis,
> said some students initially implored the police to let Khan
> go, but others soon arrived to support the police, chanting
> "Kick his ass!"
>
> According to Khan, Wells, and Curtis, one of the right-wing
> students who had earlier harassed Khan joined the cops in
> forcing him on the ground. Curtis asked the student what
> authority he was exercising, and the student backed off.
>
> However, Curtis says, a university employee who stood about
> six feet eight inches and weighed around 300 pounds began
> helping the cops to further subdue Khan. "He performed jujitsu
> moves on me while the cops held me down, and the cops let him
> do it," Khan said. "Frankly, the cops were doing just fine
> without him, but this huge guy came and put [Khan's] free arm
> in a Kamora," Curtis said, referring to a jujitsu maneuver in
> which the arm is painfully bent backwards. "You could see on
> his face that it was really hurting him," Curtis said of Khan.
>
> A police officer claimed the university employee was an
> "auxiliary police officer," but Wells, who works with the man
> in the computer store, said she had never seen him in that
> capacity.
>
> Khan said he was then dragged off by two officers toward a
> police car but was reluctant to get in. He says one cop was
> preparing to spray him with mace. "He held the can straight at
> my eyes, about five inches away from my face," Khan said. "So
> I started yelling, 'Hey, this cop is trying to mace me,
> someone take a picture if you have a camera!"
>
> Wells quickly took out her cell-phone camera and began
> snapping pictures. "After I did that, the cop put away his
> mace can and said, 'Okay, no one's going to get maced today.'
> I mean, clearly, he knew he was doing something wrong," she said.
>
> Khan says Officer Reynolds told him he had to arrest him
> because, "What with 9/11 and everything else, we didn't know
> what you would do." Khan also says another policeman told him
> that "You people are the most violent people in the world."
> Before being hauled off to the Fairfax County Jail, Khan was
> warned by the police who were questioning him that "If you
> even look at [cops] the wrong way, they'll hang you up by your
> feet."
>
> Officer Reynolds asked the handcuffed student if he needed
> medical attention or desired an attorney, Khan claims, but
> says he was granted neither medical attention nor an attorney
> after expressly asking for both.
>
> Released after two hours, Khan was charged with disorderly
> conduct and trespassing on campus - even though Khan is a
> student and police found his ID when they searched him.
>
> The student protester says he is planning to sue the school,
> the police, and the right-wing students who attacked him. "I
> went with my wife and my mother-in law to file a complaint at
> the police office right afterwards, and had pictures taken of
> all my cuts and bruises," he says.
>
> In response to the incident, the university issued a statement
> to Khan recognizing that he was staging a peaceful protest and
> insisting it was committed to students' rights to free speech
> on campus; it also said it will conduct an internal
> investigation into the conduct of the police officers and the
> other students who were involved in Thursday's events.
>
> Khan, however, is not impressed. "They haven't even contacted
> me yet," he said. "I'll believe them when I see results."
>
> Asked what motivated him to begin his protest against military
> recruiters on a campus where there is no organized anti-war
> movement, the former Air Force enlistee said, "For four years,
> I was making bombs. Then I started wondering where those bombs
> were actually going." After reading and learning about the
> bombing of Kosovo and ongoing destruction of civilian
> facilities in Iraq, he came to his conclusion: "I asked the
> questions and I wasn't happy with the answers We were bombing
> civilian plants."
>
> Speaking at a rally held on October 3 that was attended by 150
> to 200 supporters at the university, Khan sounded a defiant
> note: "I will not be bullied or intimidated into silence…The
> university authority's actions against me last Thursday were
> their way of telling me to shut up. And my answer to them is,
> no, I will not shut up...The power-mongers in this country are
> using 9/11 and terrorism as an excuse to trample all over our
> individual rights. A friend of mine recently said, 'When we've
> traded in all our freedom for security, we'll find that the
> only thing we've secured is our own incarceration.'"
>
> M. Junaid Alam, 22, is co-editor of *Left Hook* and a
> Journalism student at Northeastern University. He may be
> reached at *alam at lefthook.org*.Yahoo! for Good
>
>
>
> O29 at massglobalaction.org
> http://massglobalaction.org/mailman/listinfo/o29_massglobalaction.org
>
>
>
>
>
> On Oct 5, 2005, at 3:36 PM, Keith Rosenthal wrote:
>
> Hey All,
>
> I just wanted to throw a couple of thoughts out there regarding
> the vote and discussion at Monday's O29 meeting concerning demands
> for this protest -- specifically the demand: "Stop the racist
> scapegoating of Arabs and Muslims" also, since the political
> discussion around the demand was short and choppy in the meeting,
> i wanted to respond to several things here.
> I think it was a mistake that this demand was voted down in a
> tie vote (9-9), and some of the justifications presented for why
> it should be voted down have the potential to set a bad precedent
> for our movement. it was stated that we "don't want a radical
> protest, which will only draw 1,000 people," "that we have to
> reach out to middle America," and that we should learn the lesson
> of the Vietnam antiwar movement which, "got the hard-hats to stop
> beating up the students, but instead join the students." i think
> this perspective is erroneous and somewhat mythical.
> First of all, i don't think we should have a laundry list of
> demands on the flyer, nor do i think we should talk about
> everything under the sun on the flyer. but i don't think a demand
> around arabs and muslims is "beyond the pale," too radical, or
> will bring less people out to the march. in fact, i think it can
> draw in more people pissed about the Patriot Act, Guantanamo
> mistreatment, and, of course, will draw in Arabs and Muslims, who
> just recently have been making pleas to Romney to stop the plan to
> wiretap local Mosques! where is the antiwar movement on this
> question of the supposedly imminent and overwhelming threat that
> "Muslim and Arab extremists" pose to "our freedoms"? the demand
> around Palestine at the September 24th protest certainly did not
> make that historic march any smaller, so why would a demand to
> stop anti-Arab racist scapegoating make our march any smaller?
> Second, we ought to be less afraid right now of being "too
> radical." the single-most important figure in revitalizing mass
> antiwar activity recently has been none other than that "raving
> radical" Cindy Sheehan, who supports Palestine, the Iraq
> resistance to occupation, refuses to vote for pro-war Democrats,
> and calls the current war "imperialist." she is resonating
> with people because the reality is that right now, in the
> aftermath of the sinking occupation of Iraq and the Hurricane
> Katrina disaster, most regular people are growing increasingly fed
> up with this war and with everything having to do with the current
> government. right now, people are increasingly fed up with even
> the Democratic Party for not taking a firm enough stand against
> Bush and the war because of their concern to not alienate
> "swing-voters in middle America."
> Finally, who is this mythical "middle America," and how do we
> win them? the reality is that right now, a majority of people are
> against the war and against Bush. according to polls, 1 out of 3
> people consider themselves */part/* of the antiwar movement --
> that's 100 million people nationwide. in boston, that's
> roughly 200,000 people. once we get these people organized, it
> will be easy from there to win the other antiwar 1/3 to our side.
> also, who are we trying to win to this movement? soccer moms
> (like cindy sheehan)? sure! arabs, muslims, blacks, gays,
> women, students, latinos, workers, etc., (i.e., the majority of
> people)? we must!
> And if i may ask, which hard-hats are beating up antiwar
> students today? it's my understanding that the AFL-CIO is against
> the war in Iraq (this includes organized construction workers, i
> believe). remember, /we are the majority/! soldiers and military
> families are increasingly on our side. now is not the
> time for conservative, cautious moderation, but rather for bold,
> confident, and aggressive steps forward.
> During the vietnam war, these so-called "hard hats" (do you
> mean workers, soldiers, what?), were not won over to the side of
> the "students" because the "students" moderated their message.
> rather, they were won over to the antiwar movement because they
> simply grew more and more disgusted with the war and the
> government and felt they simply had to do something about it. in
> other words, people were going through a process where they were
> beginning to think much more critically about the government, if
> for no other reason than because of the increasing reality of what
> the government was doing to the Vietnamese people and to the US
> soldiers. this is precisely what is happening right now. the way
> we are going to win these people is not by moderating our message,
> but by taking every opportunity to expose every lie, smokescreen,
> and brutality that this government is carrying out in the name of
> this war . . . and in all of our names. in so doing, we will give
> expression to growing millions of people disgusted by the
> government and simply waiting for someone to confidently
> address the government's barbarity, blow-for-blow (e.g., Cindy
> Sheehan).
>
> In conclusion, i warn against the broader framework,
> justification, and implications used to defeat the demand on
> anti-arab racism at monday's meeting. it sounds dangerously
> similar to the logic employed by Kerry supporters in the last
> election that we have to moderate our message to appeal to
> "swing-voters in middle-America" in order to win. not only
> did that strategy, in fact, lead to a defeat for our side, but it
> also taught movement activists how to hold their tongues instead
> of raising their voices. as the 2006 congressional elections
> begin to be talked about, we would do well to remember this
> lesson, and refuse this time around to repeat our mistakes. the
> way to grow is to confidently fight for our principles and to win
> more people to them -- in tandem with their own developing
> criticisms of the war and the government -- and not by "moderating
> ourselves," "politically disciplining ourselves," or "holding our
> noses."
> Again, this is not to say that we should have a laundry-list of
> every possible demand on the flyer. but this is to say that we
> have little to lose and much to gain by adding clearly relevant
> demands and letting our movement take an increasingly critical
> posture towards the government's various policies and ideological
> buttresses. and we ought to be wary of making arguments that
> would set a precedent for our movement to balk and moderate itself
> in order to appeal to some mythical "middle-America" at the
> expense of standing up for our beliefs and for those who are most
> oppressed and victimized by this war and this government.
>
>
> Solidarity,
> Keith Rosenthal
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! for Good
> Click here to donate to the Hurricane Katrina relief
> effort._______________________________________________
> O29 mailing list
> O29 at massglobalaction.org
> http://massglobalaction.org/mailman/listinfo/o29_massglobalaction.org
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>_______________________________________________
>O29 mailing list
>O29 at massglobalaction.org
>http://massglobalaction.org/mailman/listinfo/o29_massglobalaction.org
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://massglobalaction.org/pipermail/o29_massglobalaction.org/attachments/20051005/f8b7d9ce/attachment.html>
More information about the O29
mailing list